Australian captain Steve Smith's decision no to enforce the follow-on on day three has caused huge debate in the cricketing world.
With Australia leading by 215 runs after bowling England out for 227, rather than put the the tourists back in to bat again under lights at Adelaide Oval, in what were sure to be difficult conditions, Smith opted to bat again, effectively allowing the English back into the game.
Australia finished day three at 4-53. While the hosts have a lead of 268 and are still in a brilliant position, England have managed to wrestle some momentum back and a few quick wickets early on day four will really put the pressure on.
Hindsight is a beautiful thing and Smith's decision left many wondering who was part of the decision making process.
But fast bowler Mitchell Starc revealed following the day's play, the decision was solely Smith's.
“We didn't tonight,” Starc told reporters when asked if the team was consulted before the decision.
“That's why he's the captain. He makes the decisions. There are pros and cons to both.
“The follow-on is completely up to Smithy. Whether it's about four bowlers or not the decision stays with him and we are all feeling pretty good.”
The decision not to follow-on is a strange one in itself, but not to consult the team's fast bowlers appears even more peculiar.
But Starc is adamant he is not concerned with Australia's loss of four wickets late on day three, with the home side still in a good position.
“We know the night session is the toughest time to bat as we saw tonight,” he said.
“England only had to do it for 10 overs so far. If they want to go ahead and win this Test match, they are probably going to have to bat through two night sessions. It's great signs for us with the ball if you look at that session we had to face with the bat.”
